Theory of Knowledge for the IB Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Hypothesis of Knowledge for the IB - Essay Example The subsequent definition goes past the first purpose behind the creation of machines. Rather than simply supporting us in our day by day errands by being augmentations of our bodies in playing out their assignments, machines, particularly since a machine called PCs are imagined, become entertainers of undertakings freely of its client. For whatever length of time that its activities are modified so that it would now be able to perform errands without the nearness or the continuous control of people. They have become complex that they can outperform what we can do. Mechanical cranes can lift complex occasions the greatest weight that the most grounded living human can. Mechanical production system robots can achieve an assignment path past a group of quickest human specialists of that specific occupation. What's more, in 1997, a supercomputer named Deep Blue vanquished the then world chess champion, Garry Kasparov. The intensity of machines exponentially expands our ability to deliver products and ventures. It is reasonable that they can surpass our mechanical capacities. Be that as it may, as far as our intellectual capacities, machines, for example, Deep Blue has been modified to outmaneuver our levelheaded resources. This presents an inquiry that we are to determine in this paper. Can a machine know Prior to going further, we should initially characterize what the action word to know signifies. In English this word has a few definitions. In the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Fourth Edition) know has eight definitions: 1. To see legitimately; handle in the psyche with lucidity or sureness. 2. To view as obvious certain. 3. To have a pragmatic comprehension of, as through experience; be talented in 4. To have fixed in the brain: 5. To have understanding of: 6a. To see as natural; perceive: b. To be familiar with: 7. To have the option to recognize; perceive as unmistakable: knows directly from wrong. 8. To recognize the character or nature of: The definitions above give us various parts of know. By these we can say that knowing something begins when we see a thing by our faculties, handling this obtained data to a point that we become familiar with those things and winds up with the ability of the knowing individual to unmistakably recognize or perceive that thing from others. The rise of the Information Age has presented machines that can think freely. They, for example, supercomputers, can handle and procedure information at astonishing velocities. In a small amount of a second, they can perform scientific tasks that a human can do in hours or even years. With this limit, they can truly perform judicious exercises, in any event to a limited degree. In any case, would we be able to express that this present supercomputer's capacity to process information is now a demonstration of knowing given the meaning of know above For me, I accept that machines can't completely know. They may perform mental undertakings of people with quickness and exactness route over that of people. Yet they can't thoroughly know things according to characterized by word references. In the event that we utilize the definitions above, they miss the mark regarding altogether knowing something. To demonstrate this, let us consider the primary definition To see legitimately, handle in the brain with clearness or assurance. Computers are intended to see and handle information to help us in our undertakings. Word preparing programs, for instance, are made for us to compose a letters and different archives in an exact and flawless way. It can get information coming